Genevan Mysterie defended.: Two critical examinations of Remonstrant Positions against Calvinistic Perceptions of Predestination: a Comparison

F. van der Pol

Genevan Mysterie defended. Two critical examinations of Remonstrant Positions against Calvinistic Perceptions of Predestination: a Comparison

The Neo-Calvinism Research Institute

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Chapter › Academic

Original language	English
Title of host publication	The Doctrine of Election in Reformed Perspective.
Subtitle of host publication	Historical and Theological Investigations of the Synod of Dordt 1618-1619
Editors	F. van der Pol
Place of Publication	Göttingen
Publisher	Vandenhoeck and Ruprecht GmbH and Co. KG
Pages	185-213
Publication status	Published - 2019

Cite this

van der Pol, F. (2019). Genevan Mysterie defended. Two critical examinations of Remonstrant Positions against Calvinistic Perceptions of Predestination: a Comparison. In F. van der Pol (Ed.), The Doctrine of Election in Reformed Perspective.: Historical and Theological Investigations of the Synod of Dordt 1618-1619 (pp. 185-213). Vandenhoeck and Ruprecht GmbH and Co. KG.

van der Pol, F. / Genevan Mysterie defended. Two critical examinations of Remonstrant Positions against Calvinistic Perceptions of Predestination: a Comparison. The Doctrine of Election in Reformed Perspective.: Historical and Theological Investigations of the Synod of Dordt 1618-1619. editor / F. van der Pol. Göttingen : Vandenhoeck and Ruprecht GmbH and Co. KG, 2019. pp. 185-213

@inbook{01ea69a8ed4a4667b98b181b89e46657,

title = "Genevan Mysterie defended.: Two critical examinations of Remonstrant Positions against Calvinistic Perceptions of Predestination: a Comparison",

author = "{van der Pol}, F.",

year = "2019",

language = "English",

pages = "185--213",

editor = "{van der Pol}, F.",

booktitle = "The Doctrine of Election in Reformed Perspective.",

publisher = "Vandenhoeck and Ruprecht GmbH and Co. KG",

address = "Germany",

}

van der Pol, F 2019, Genevan Mysterie defended. Two critical examinations of Remonstrant Positions against Calvinistic Perceptions of Predestination: a Comparison. in F van der Pol (ed.), The Doctrine of Election in Reformed Perspective.: Historical and Theological Investigations of the Synod of Dordt 1618-1619. Vandenhoeck and Ruprecht GmbH and Co. KG, Göttingen, pp. 185-213.

Genevan Mysterie defended. Two critical examinations of Remonstrant Positions against Calvinistic Perceptions of Predestination: a Comparison. / van der Pol, F.

The Doctrine of Election in Reformed Perspective.: Historical and Theological Investigations of the Synod of Dordt 1618-1619. ed. / F. van der Pol. Göttingen : Vandenhoeck and Ruprecht GmbH and Co. KG, 2019. p. 185-213.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Chapter › Academic

TY - CHAP

T1 - Genevan Mysterie defended.

T2 - Two critical examinations of Remonstrant Positions against Calvinistic Perceptions of Predestination: a Comparison

AU - van der Pol, F.

PY - 2019

Y1 - 2019

M3 - Chapter

SP - 185

EP - 213

BT - The Doctrine of Election in Reformed Perspective.

A2 - van der Pol, F.

PB - Vandenhoeck and Ruprecht GmbH and Co. KG

CY - Göttingen

ER -

van der Pol F. Genevan Mysterie defended. Two critical examinations of Remonstrant Positions against Calvinistic Perceptions of Predestination: a Comparison. In van der Pol F, editor, The Doctrine of Election in Reformed Perspective.: Historical and Theological Investigations of the Synod of Dordt 1618-1619. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck and Ruprecht GmbH and Co. KG. 2019. p. 185-213